News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Billions without Buzz by morgante on Friday June 27, 2014 @05:48PM (#7956436)
> Companies who still need high growth to justify their stock price (read: Apple)

Terrible example. Apple in fact has a very low P/E for this sector (it's 1/2 that of Google). Apple could have zero growth and remain highly profitable for years.

Re:Billions without Buzz by ericsink on Friday June 27, 2014 @06:42PM (#7956600)
"Apple could have zero growth and remain highly profitable for years."

Sure they could. But Wall Street would punish their stock price anyway.

Not everything about the way AAPL fluctuates is rational. Maybe NOTHING about it is rational. :-)

But the concerns about Apple's ability to sustain its ridiculous growth ARE quite real. Their growth IS slowing.

Re:Billions without Buzz by x0x0 on Saturday June 28, 2014 @01:59AM (#7957570)
but doesn't the low p/e indicate most growth is already priced out of apple?

as of today (numbers from yahoo finance):

   tick  p/e
   amzn  506
   fb     87.6
   goog   30.25
   csco   16.67
   intc   16.55
   hp     16.29
   msft   15.83
   appl   15.4
   ibm    12.4
   twtr   n/a (<0)
   (sorted descending)
Re:Billions without Buzz by tempestn on Saturday June 28, 2014 @03:43PM (#7959100)
One would think so. It's nice to see a company with a lot of buzz have a reasonable p/e. (As the largest company in the world, how massive could it's growth really be?) I personally had no idea it was so low - especially compared to the likes of Amazon. Of course the price could still drop if earnings do.