News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitstamped by markild on Friday June 27, 2014 @04:51AM (#7953224)
Nice writeup, I think your conclusion is pretty spot on. People neglect to buy insurance, don't back up data, and ignore safety margins. Why would they start timestamping their files.

That being said, I really like how the service worked. If I understand it correctly, I would download the signed work (signed .exe with content included), which also means that I would have proof after the service got shut down.

Re:Bitstamped by latitude on Friday June 27, 2014 @04:53AM (#7953231)
Yup, exactly.

It used AuthentiCode executable signing to bind VeriSign's timestamps to the documents. Basically, this allows for an unlimited use of VeriSign's mature and robust timestamping infrastructure for a cost of a single signing certificate ($150/year or thereabouts). Not to pat myself on the back, but I think it was nothing short of ingenious :)