News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Masters of Love by colanderman on Thursday June 26, 2014 @03:20PM (#7951160)
then square that

1-(1-x)^2 to be pedantic :) (i.e. if 10% of the population is mean, 19% (=100%-(100%-10%)^2) of random pairings have at least one mean person, not 1% (=10% squared))

I don't know of a simple term to describe that relation though; is there one?

Re:Masters of Love by jacobolus on Thursday June 26, 2014 @04:44PM (#7951491)
"Double that then subtract the square" just doesn’t have the same ring, huh?
Re:Masters of Love by bryondowd on Friday June 27, 2014 @09:29AM (#7953819)
Squaring alone would work if you looked at the odds of both people being nice. If 90% of the population is nice, squaring it would give you 81% of pairings being nice, which matches the above example. Just have to take the glass half full perspective.
Re:Masters of Love by lcedp on Friday June 27, 2014 @05:01AM (#7953258)
IDK, but it reads quite eloquently: "probability of not((x1 is mean) and (x2 is mean))"