News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @11:42AM (#7944644)
The difference is obvious: when you're home recording, you're doing it for yourself, while Aereo is doing it for others. The fact that it's using 1 antenna/recording per user is an irrelevant technical detail.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by ironchef on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @01:50PM (#7945595)
What's the difference between me clicking on my remote to tell tivo to record for me than me clicking on a button in a web page telling aereo to record for me? It's still being done on request, no?
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @02:26PM (#7945830)
Aereo controls what gets recorded, TiVo (the company) doesn't. They're not selling an agnostic tool, they're selling the recording of a particular set of channels.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by veritas20 on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @02:31PM (#7945869)
Not sure that this is true from a technical level, but from a customer level, I actually choose the shows to be recorded in a similar fashion that I would use TiVo. Aereo only records what you schedule to be record when it comes to their DVR portion of the service.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @04:58PM (#7946721)
When I mean record, I mean capture and encode the signal. It doesn't have to be viewed asynchronously to be a recording.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by ironchef on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @02:33PM (#7945890)
How does Aereo control what gets recorded? I click to record a show in the interface. That tunes the antenna to that channel at that time and records an individual recording for me.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @02:43PM (#7945947)
By choosing where to place the antennas.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by ironchef on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @03:19PM (#7946183)
Choosing where to place the antennas largely affects the who can sign up for the service. Antenna placement does not cause me clicking "record channel 4 at 7:30 pm" to become "record channel 7 at 9 am".

Try again?

Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by politician on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @12:45PM (#7945135)
When "I" am home recording, I am actually using the capabilities of a black box technological device purchased from a 3rd party. Are VCRs illegal now?
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @01:08PM (#7945289)
It's still you who are recording, not the 3rd party. If I purposely hit someone with my car, the car manufacturer can't be blamed, but if I tell my driver to hit someone and he does, shouldn't he be blamed?
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by dd36 on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @01:39PM (#7945533)
It is you that are recording with Aereo's service...
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @02:24PM (#7945821)
Not anymore than I'm driving through my driver. Aereo controls what gets recorded, not the user. They're not an agnostic tool that can be used for any purpose, like a VCR.
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by coldpie on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @01:32PM (#7945475)
Are you really suggesting it should be illegal for me to pay someone else to record a television show for me while I'm away?
Re:Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf] by icebraining on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @01:35PM (#7945496)
Oh, I would never suggest that. I think what Aereo does should be legal. But judges are supposed to uphold the existing law, not what they think it should be.