News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eigenmorality by dogecoinbase on Saturday June 21, 2014 @07:00PM (#7926306)
"Follow" is not a verb used in the context of books or Wikipedia articles. Any neither characteristically provides ideas in a "shorter, clearer form". Your request was, to any reasonable observer, explicitly a request for a content-driven site or blog (i.e., a "single newsfeed style source"). Denying it when it's so clearly a falsehood only undermines the rest of your assertions, and casts into doubt your commitment to the (accurate) assertion that we should care about methods of disrupting existing controlling systems... perhaps to the point where it would not be unreasonable to conclude that you're explicitly attempting to undermine good-faith attempts to produce new stable systems.

So who are you working for?

Re:Eigenmorality by mentat on Sunday June 22, 2014 @12:48AM (#7926927)
"Follow" is used in the context of authors of classical works in academia and has been used prior to any use in the forms you claim are its exclusive domain.
Re:Eigenmorality by jng on Saturday June 21, 2014 @07:33PM (#7926366)
Just myself.

EDIT: The answer to the rest is not generally interesting.