News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Fire Phone by nailer on Thursday June 19, 2014 @07:35AM (#7915583)
Objectively means facts, eg:

- Rubber breaks down faster than metal

- Rubber stains more than the metals you'd use in a phone

- Rubber can be torn, metal can't

So yes, objectively.

If you drop your phone a lot, rubber might help, but you'd need more than what the Fire phone provides.

Re:Amazon Fire Phone by personZ on Thursday June 19, 2014 @09:45AM (#7916004)
So yes, objectively.

No, it isn't objectively. You are subjectively choosing the criteria that makes one purportedly better than the other, yet they have zero applicability to the use or operation of a smartphone.

Grip matters very much with a smartphone. Rubber breaking down? Has anyone ever actually seen this happen? Is this actually a problem? Torn or stained? Again, is this actually a problem in the context of a smartphone? I would say no, it isn't at all.

A soft, comfortable, lightweight device that you don't have to immediately shroud in a protective case is, by actual use-based criteria, arguably the better "build quality". Build quality is suitability to purpose, not aesthetics or cult of material.

Re:Amazon Fire Phone by nailer on Thursday June 19, 2014 @10:30AM (#7916240)
Within the criteria of robustness, robustness can be measured objectively.

You have different criteria than robustness - understood, grip is important to you. Grip has its own objective measurements.

Christ.