News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Pierre Sprey on the F-35 [video]. Parent comment

Re:Pierre Sprey on the F-35 [video] by branchan on Wednesday June 18, 2014 @12:51AM (#7908577)
It is not sufficient to just be able to carry missiles in the air. Missiles only work in conjunction with the right sensor and radar systems to designate and guide it to the target.

So yes, you do need both the plane (with onboard sensor/radar) and missiles in order to hope for a kill.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pierre Sprey on the F-35 [video] by TeMPOraL on Wednesday June 18, 2014 @02:06AM (#7908725)
Can't a drone carry those sensors and radar and still be an order of magnitude cheaper than a fighter jet?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pierre Sprey on the F-35 [video] by branchan on Wednesday June 18, 2014 @03:52PM (#7912406)
Sensors and radars take more space, power and weight. So the drone will need to be bigger and more expensive and before you know, you will probably end up with something that looks and costs just like a normal jet fighter.

The F-35 is $200M. The Global Hawk drone is about $50M already and that's without any weapons systems.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pierre Sprey on the F-35 [video] by FireBeyond on Wednesday June 18, 2014 @11:20PM (#7914227)
50M? As of last year, 131M
[ Parent | on HN ]