Yes, there's nothing illegal or "wrong" with thinking. That's why every `conspiracy to X` charge necessarily requires a proof of intent. It isn't illegal to think about killing someone, if it was 99% of the world would be in jail.
Put it this way, should it be illegal for whitehat hackers to test a program, on their home computer, for bugs? There's no intent to do harm but what they;re doing could cause harm if they intended to.
The level of thinking you do should not and does not automatically cause you to have a certain level of intent.
How could "predators" harm anyone if they're talking to a computer model?
Jurors aren't mind readers. We have have a practical way to determine there was intent. Creating a plan to commit a crime shows intent. If you were doing it just because you're an ass-hat then you may pay the price for being an idiot.
No reasonable person is going to document a plan for a crime they have no intention of committing. You're living in a theoretical fantasy land.
What would you suggest that we do with someone caught with plans to bomb a building? Let them go until they actually do it and then arrest them?