Re:US lifts restrictions on more detailed satellite images
by keithg on Monday June 16, 2014 @01:39PM
(#7900360)
Presumably citizens are allowed because they don't have the power to charge & convict you of some alleged crime. If the citizen's imagery were somehow brought into a legal matter, then it would be up to the judge to determine its legality. Conversely and unfortunately, law enforcement and government seem to enjoy a defacto legality until someone says otherwise. By limiting their use of this technology, hopefully it mitigates the defacto and clandestine nature of it, bringing it at least to a level of awareness during legal proceedings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States
This means that police may not be able to routinely use imaging technologies, including active radars, to look through the walls of people's homes.
(Interestingly, this is a way in which police now have fewer powers than the general public, since in most places there are no laws preventing you as a civilian from using infrared imaging to look at someone's house.)