News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anti-Tesla sentiment and the death of optimism by TheOtherHobbes on Friday June 13, 2014 @12:19PM (#7889580)
They didn't need patent law, because they had princes and armies. The also had a culture in which information couldn't travel faster than a man (usually a man...) on a horse, and patentable information could only be understood by a few hundred individuals in each country, at most.

One of the points of patent law is to distribute the rewards of invention, so individual inventors - not corporations - benefit from their creativity.

Patent protections aren't the only element in this, but they're one element, and a lot of 20th century products would never have appeared otherwise.

It's simply not historical to argue otherwise.

The 21st century works differently, but with the irony that the FOSS people claim their way is absolutely correct, and no other system is workable.

Sharing certainly works if you have a day job that pays your bills. But innovation is not invention. Patents were originally designed for creative inventors, not commercial packaging operations like [insert corporate giant here], or freeware mash-up/YetAnotherFramework projects.

In the US at least, the system has become a joke. But just because it's broken doesn't mean that inventors shouldn't be rewarded and protected somehow.

There are no comments on this comment yet.