3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cater for the former?

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by pmontra on Thursday June 12, 2014 @10:35AM (#7883623)

It's not built-in but the Stylish extension does that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by sp332 on Thursday June 12, 2014 @10:50AM (#7883697)

Claudius is being sarcastic. http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=UserContent.css

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by claudius on Thursday June 12, 2014 @12:10PM (#7884228)

Sarcastic, yes, but mostly relating to Opera 12.x’s UserCSS features; I didn’t actually know about userContent.css. Thanks for the pointer, although it seems to be impossible to only apply it to certain sites?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by sp332 on Thursday June 12, 2014 @12:54PM (#7884506)

@-moz-document url-prefix() or @-moz-document domain() ? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@document http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=286866

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by claudius on Thursday June 12, 2014 @02:20PM (#7885100)

Yay, thank you for the handholding, it actually seems to work quite nicely :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by judk on Thursday June 12, 2014 @11:34AM (#7883985)

Chrome however is deprecating this feature. Stylish will be required.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:3% use IE9 and 14% have a disability. Why do we only cate... by krapp on Thursday June 12, 2014 @10:40AM (#7883641)

greasemonkey can too, with the added benefit of being able to script the page as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]