News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HFS+ Bit Rot by clord on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @11:00PM (#7876354)
You're right, that reported failure rate is way too low, I'd be glad to only have 26 corrupt files. I have one disk with about 300gb of CR2 files (HFS+). Not long ago I did a similar procedure as in the article (except that I also had the files on a ZFS mirror (I was cleaning up the HFS disk and checking for duplicates before formatting) and found 250 files with bit errors compared to the reference. Fortunately only about 1 in 3 of the bit errors resulted in corrupt files.

Needless to say I no longer keep anything of consequence on non-checksummed filesystems now.

Re:HFS+ Bit Rot by Buge on Wednesday June 11, 2014 @12:53AM (#7876564)
It annoys me when someone says "you're right" and then completely disagrees with the first person.
Re:HFS+ Bit Rot by vertis on Wednesday June 11, 2014 @02:10AM (#7876670)
It's easy to read the first persons post either way. That you're lucky they ONLY got 26 corrupt files, or that 26 is extraordinarily unlikely.
Re:HFS+ Bit Rot by Buge on Thursday June 12, 2014 @09:46PM (#7887057)
I think the "at-rest files through natural causes" gives it away.