Re:Results of Stack Overflow survey of 20,000 developers
by glaugh on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @05:08PM
(#7875330)
. Yup, you can make filters universal with the "Enable Filters" button in the upper left (only applies to future analyses, not retrospectively).
. The data is actually freely available for download via Stack Overflow, who ran the survey[1]. As per your comment, I'd hope that everyone who took the survey was informed that results would be available for download, but I can't tell for sure because the survey link is dead.
. (Just emailed you for a screenshot, I can't replicate)
. The last one isn't a bug per se. The UI around separately and intuitively exposing the ability to (1) sort by count, (2) sort by alpha, and (3) sort arbitrarily is a bit tricky. That said, point taken that the expected behavior on clicking was that it would sort in the user-determined arbitrary order (arbitrary since Statwing isn't yet smart enough to understand ranges, so those ranges were user-set into order).
. The data is actually freely available for download via Stack Overflow, who ran the survey[1]. As per your comment, I'd hope that everyone who took the survey was informed that results would be available for download, but I can't tell for sure because the survey link is dead.
. (Just emailed you for a screenshot, I can't replicate)
. The last one isn't a bug per se. The UI around separately and intuitively exposing the ability to (1) sort by count, (2) sort by alpha, and (3) sort arbitrarily is a bit tricky. That said, point taken that the expected behavior on clicking was that it would sort in the user-determined arbitrary order (arbitrary since Statwing isn't yet smart enough to understand ranges, so those ranges were user-set into order).
Thanks a bunch, really appreciate the feedback.
[1] http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2014/02/2013-stack-overflow-us... ,
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2013/01/2012-stack-overflow-us...
(2011 isn't actually available for download, you have to email them)