News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT at center of political power play over campus fusion ... by Retric on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @01:18PM (#7873900)
The rate of fusion changes as the square of density but you still get fusion at vary low density's given sufficient energy it's just less common. You might be thinking of fission?

As to PP fusion from what read. Without a large enough plasma the beta more common proton emission path >99.99% ends up costing more energy than you gain from beta-plus decay <0.01%. "The least stable is 5He, with a half-life of 7.6×10−22 seconds, although it is possible that 2He has an even shorter half-life" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_helium#Helium-2_.28...

Re:MIT at center of political power play over campus fusion ... by pdonis on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @05:06PM (#7875323)
> The rate of fusion changes as the square of density but you still get fusion at vary low density's given sufficient energy it's just less common

How much less common? Again, have you seen any actual evidence that P-P fusion events actually happen in actual Earth-bound plasmas? Because the numbers I've seen indicate that at Earth-bound plasma densities, such events are so unlikely that we should not expect to have observed any.

Re:MIT at center of political power play over campus fusion ... by Retric on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @08:34PM (#7876066)
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb/Papers/Preprints/Solarfusion/pap... "the rate for the fundamental p1p→2 D1e11ne reaction is too small to be measured in the laboratory. Instead, the cross section for the p-p reaction must be calculated from standard weak-interaction theory." Considering the solar density's are ~10^11 times as high as steady state fusion experiments on earth we are looking at ~1/10^22 as many reactions so you might be right that beta-plus decay of deuterium may not have happened in the lab but PP fusion into deuterium is far more common.

PS: And thanks for this, it's good to be called out on something like this. I tossed out the PP comment without thinking though simple contamination is a far larger source of high energy neutrons.

Re:MIT at center of political power play over campus fusion ... by pdonis on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @11:00PM (#7876359)
> beta-plus decay of deuterium may not have happened in the lab but PP fusion into deuterium is far more common

It looks to me like the comment about the rate being too small to measure in the lab applies to the PP fusion into deuterium; that's the reaction referred to in the statement you quote. The positron that's produced is not a "beta-plus decay of deuterium"; it's a product of the PP fusion into deuterium, part of the same overall reaction.