News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Docker Misconceptions by TallGuyShort on Monday June 09, 2014 @05:43PM (#7870692)
There are 2 other misconceptions I would really like to be less prevalent:

1) Linux containers are not an entirely new concept. If you didn't know about BSD jails or Solaris zones, you were missing out. If you still don't know the differences, I highly recommend you broaden your horizons. Even if you use Linux anyway, just knowing about what's out there will help you be smarter.

2) Docker is not a drop-in replacement for every current VM use case. It's just not. To HN's credit, I really haven't seen people here who seem to think that, but it's on my list nonetheless.

Re:Docker Misconceptions by Kurtz79 on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @11:33AM (#7873111)
I use a chrooted environment for development daily, but I didn't know of more advanced containment tools.

I was fooling around with lxc containers over the last hour and they seem to me a much simpler concept to understand that the whole Docker ecosystem.

Is Docker doing basically the same thing, but offering a more structured and controlled way of doing it ?

Re:Docker Misconceptions by TallGuyShort on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @12:54PM (#7873716)
Docker could be thought of as a wrapper to LXC, providing some additional management capabilities and tooling. It's often described as a "packaging" format for applications, and you then deploy these applications in containers. So the application is actually all of userspace that you're going to use bundled together, and then run on a sort of "partition" of a kernel.