Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by lsaferite on Monday June 09, 2014 @06:51PM
(#7870962)
But that still leave my original question.
Assuming his job is not PR (I don't know or care to know him), how would his behaviour during non-company time translate into being fired?
Mind you, it sounds like he's a real pleasant person that I'd totally get along with. /s
Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by graffic on Friday June 20, 2014 @03:07AM
(#7919792)
Appealing to emotions!
Because other people think like him, he is harassing her. Nice logic.
The bonus point is: because other people think I'm an asshole, they're harassing me. That totally made my day.
At least he got a job with an employer that can defend employees against pogroms. Good for him.
Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by arzugula on Monday June 09, 2014 @07:44PM
(#7871157)
Please. If his tweet with a naughty word constitutes a "harassment campaign" that contributes to an environment where someone is terrorized then what are we calling the streams of hatred Shanley and her group spew towards Ryan Block, Marc Andreesen, Paul Graham, etc.?
For instance, @zivcjs aggressively harassed her, retweeting attackers calling her "animal" and I believe "psychob---h". He also deleted many of his tweets.
Furthermore, such harassment campaigns generally cause an increase in the violent threats they already normally receive. It contributes to an environment where women are terrorized and chased out of the industry. And imagine a woman having to work with this harasser.
As for economic oppression, he crows about "Non-stop phone calls" with so many job offers that he's "struggling to remember who sent what." (https://twitter.com/zivcjs)