Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by gress on Monday June 09, 2014 @04:42PM
(#7870381)
You are conflating agency and privilege. In the case of resisting oppression, the available actions are unchanged, but the consequences are different.
Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by tedks on Monday June 09, 2014 @05:43PM
(#7870694)
This is a weak sort of agency. Indeed I'm able to resist capitalist oppression by not working, but if the consequences are that I starve to death than I hardly see that as a reasonable outcome.
I think this is an uninteresting definitional question at this point, though. If I'm misusing agency than so is the author of this piece; the important thing is that we be able to communicate, which I think is possible. If you want to further nitpick specific words to garner karma, do it with someone else.
Re:I'm Telling: Employer-Tattling and the Decline of Agency
by gress on Monday June 09, 2014 @07:05PM
(#7871010)
There are lots of other things you can do to resist capitalist oppression - e.g. Unionize, or create other kinds of social support. A strawman isn't very useful.
I'm sorry you've chosen to be accusatory instead of reasonable.
Resisting oppressive behavior is limiting the agency of privileged people to oppress others.
You can construct some notion of agency that doesn't say these words, but at the end of the day you're reducing the amount of available actions and that is reducing agency. Sometimes it is good to reduce agency.