News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ted Kennedy has died by unalone on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @03:47AM (#786774)
Perhaps those of us that like Ted Kennedy weren't the ones bashing Michael Jackson?

I'm inclined to forgive people their many, many errors. I see no harm in looking at a man's accomplishments and ignoring his failures.

Michael Jackson was a man who changed the entertainment world. Ted Kennedy spent decades fighting for his causes without rest. Each did unpleasant things, but those things don't eliminate the good each did.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by TomOfTTB on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:30AM (#786831)
I do see a problem in ignoring a fault when that fault is "killed someone and received no punishment for it". It's an injustice to the victim to do anything else.

If Justice is not an ideal you hold than you wouldn't agree with me on that.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by andreyf on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @06:32AM (#786942)
It's an injustice to the victim to do anything else.

Justice is not the same as revenge, and often quite the opposite. In this particular case, especially in hindsight, I find it hard to imagine a heavy-handed prosecution and jail time having been a good idea.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by unalone on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:38AM (#786839)
Suggesting I don't believe in justice because I like Ted Kennedy? That's a bit vicious, don't you think?

Look, I think that Ted deserved punishment for what he did. Of course he did. At the same time, I can't blame him for using connections to get out of that mess. I'll be totally honest and say that if I fucked up big-time, I'd do everything I could to avoid years in prison for it. Not because I think people should get away with killing people, but because years in prison is a terrifying punishment. So while I kind of wish he'd been given more than a slap on the wrist, I don't hold it against him that he wasn't punished.

To suggest that he wasn't changed by what he did, however, is ludicrous. I'm certain he was haunted by that incident for a long, long time, and that it changed who he was as a person. Certainly the Ted Kennedy that died today was not the Ted Kennedy that once abandoned a dying woman.

We all grow up and leave our tragic youths behind. Some youths are just much more tragic than others.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by ErrantX on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @10:40AM (#787234)
> Certainly the Ted Kennedy that died today was not the Ted Kennedy that once abandoned a dying woman.

In my experience that is a fallacy. Besides he was a politician - they know all about expected response. I don't think anyone here can make a statement like that.

(I know nothing about him, but it was a pretty sick thing to do. He certainly deserved a worse punishment)

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by unalone on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @12:05PM (#787418)
He did. But avoiding punishment for that crime does not immediately make him a terrible human being, or a human being that's incapable of changing. He certainly changed, and for the better.

(I'll ignore the "he was a politician" quip, which proves nothing and says nothing.)

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by ErrantX on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @11:08PM (#788554)
> (I'll ignore the "he was a politician" quip, which proves nothing and says nothing.

That wasn't meant in the way you probably read it. Being a politician is a skill just like any job

As I said I don't know much about the guy, but in my experience of people in such a position (a public post) there is a difference between real change and the change we see :)

I'm just saying: only a few people (i.e. the close family) really could make a statement like that :)

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by protomyth on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @12:40PM (#787513)
I have always believed "the end justifies the means" to be a statement of evil, and I guess I see "I see no harm in looking at a man's accomplishments and ignoring his failures" to be uncomfortably close.

The problem I see with that attitude is that it opens up a whole lot of people (who are broadly agreed to be better off unborn) to lionization. Maybe Kennedy did help a lot of people, but maybe someone else would have done more in his position. At the moment that tested his personal beliefs, that required action rather then crafted words, he failed and someone died.

When powerful people can get away with acts that would damn the normal people, I see precious little hope that government will be about what would actually help the people.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by roundsquare on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:38AM (#786840)
I don't think its right to ignore someone's failures. However, it is right to balance their failures and accomplishments.

I'm hesitant to jump into this and try to balance this myself, but Chappaquiddick is a huge mark against him.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by unalone on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:44AM (#786849)
[...] it is right to balance their failures and accomplishments [...] Chappaquiddick is a huge mark against him

The terminologies you're using suggest somehow ranking him, or judging him. I don't think that's useful at all. Ted Kennedy is dead. Most likely, I'll never think of him much after today. While he was alive, I never had to vote for him, or vote on his policies. So to me, and I'm sure to you, he is an abstract celebrity.

I gain nothing by judging him on Chappaquiddick. How do I balance that against his push for health care? What does the one have to do with the other? Nothing: I can judge each on its own merits. As it happens, the health care debate is far from over; Chappaquiddick is an ancient tragedy.

When I think about a life that's just died, I see no wrong in thinking about only the good. That's not to say I'll go about pretending Ted Kennedy was a hero of mine. It just says that I won't pretend that I'm using his death as a moral lesson, and so won't pretend that I care much about his murky past or that I see any value in damning a dead man.

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by roundsquare on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:53AM (#786859)
> The terminologies you're using suggest somehow ranking him, or judging him.

Fair point, bad writing on my part. Ok, really bad writing.

But to go back to the top of the thread, the discussion was about lessons to be learned. The fact that he get got off so lightly does teach us something about how much influence rich/powerful families have. You may think its obvious, but I think its a) a bit of an eye opener though most people won't admit it and b) good to be reminded of it.

On the other hand, there are positive lessons to learn from his efforts in the senate.

My point is that its important to learn all the lessons if your going to try to look at someone's life and learn them at all.

Edit: Also, I'm not really a huge fan of treading softly just because someone has died. I'm not going to go around and bash the guy, but I think its good to have an honest discussion (at least here on HN, obviously not in other situations).

Re:Ted Kennedy has died by unalone on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @12:07PM (#787422)
Honest discussion? Right now people are just flaming. I don't see much point in discussing the dead at all - it's not going to change a thing about their lives - and I don't see the point in us all gathering round and arguing about how best to judge his life. The way I see it, if we're going to talk about the dead on Hacker News, it should be about the dead's accomplishments and not about the dead person himself.
Re:Ted Kennedy has died by rms on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @04:42AM (#786844)
He did pay one serious price in that incident made him unelectable as US President.
Re:Ted Kennedy has died by gloob on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @09:04AM (#787074)
Given the free choice of X number of years in jail or not being able to become president, I have a feeling the vast majority of people being tried for the various forms of manslaughter, murder, etc. would be thrilled to choose the second. That's probably a solid sign that the punishment is not really all that comparable in magnitude.
Re:Ted Kennedy has died by hughprime on Wednesday August 26, 2009 @10:15AM (#787177)
It should have made him unelectable as Senator as well. If his name had been Smith instead of Kennedy then it would have.