Ah yes, I've run into this. It's certainly not some kind of "rabbit hole." So basically, there's a few lines of boilerplate for each time you want to sort something. So this is O(1) additional typing per sorted type, which is what it would be for generics. You're trying to kill your argument with faint support?

EDIT: Granted, it is an unusual formulation, and far less convenient.

1-A. SearchFloat64s

2-A. SearchInts

3-A. SearchStrings

http://golang.org/pkg/sort/

Ho hum. Same arguments apply. Also O(1) per type, just like generics.