News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, JavaScript and Wolfram. Parent comment

Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by qznc on Friday June 06, 2014 @06:59AM (#7857130)
The important word here is "functional" C++. This is not about "fastest" C++. What does your comparison tell us?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by taeric on Friday June 06, 2014 @07:15AM (#7857178)
That functional might not be the best damned paradigm on the planet for every use case? :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by mimog on Friday June 06, 2014 @08:41AM (#7857507)
It tells us that nimrod is pretty fast.
[ Parent | on HN ]