News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by kbenson on Thursday June 05, 2014 @10:25PM (#7855897)
While I think the comment here leaves that open as a possibility, the second sentence of the article it's from makes it pretty clear. "Specifically, Sun says that a platform-independent Java program delivered as bytecodes in class files will run on Hotspot at speeds on par with an equivalent C++ program compiled to a native executable."

There's not a lot of wiggle room there.

Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by jdmichal on Friday June 06, 2014 @03:19AM (#7856580)
Considering that I can get different performance for the same C++ program simply by using different compiler, or even different compiler options, I'd say that there's a lot of wiggle room.
Re:Performance comparison of Functional C++ 11, Java 8, Java... by cbsmith on Friday June 06, 2014 @12:46AM (#7856251)
Actually, there is a country mile of wiggle room there. It doesn't have to be true of all programs for one, and "on par with" gives you plenty of wiggle room.