Re:US immigration didn't allow us to build a team here, so w...
by wvenable on Thursday June 05, 2014 @02:47PM
(#7853504)
Your point is correct. But hiring a US citizen would be better for the country because not only would there be the potential tax income but the savings from lower unemployment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US immigration didn't allow us to build a team here, so w...
by untog on Thursday June 05, 2014 @03:12PM
(#7853641)
How many talented developers are out of work in the US right now? Particularly in somewhere like the Bay area, where this startup would be based.
Re:US immigration didn't allow us to build a team here, so w...
by gohrt on Thursday June 05, 2014 @03:28PM
(#7853761)
> How many talented developers are out of work in the US right now? Particularly in somewhere like the Bay area,
0, which is why salaries and rents are incredibly high.
Re:US immigration didn't allow us to build a team here, so w...
by wvenable on Thursday June 05, 2014 @04:30PM
(#7854199)
The Bay area might be short on developers but I know there are talented developers in other states that are unemployed or underemployed. So Colombia is ok but Nebraska is not?
Re:US immigration didn't allow us to build a team here, so w...
by fredfoobar on Thursday June 05, 2014 @02:55PM
(#7853550)
While I agree that hiring a US citizen would be better for the country and I'm certain that all talented US citizens have jobs or are creating more jobs (through startups). But, I think there is merit in attracting top talent from other countries and retaining them as well (who in turn contribute to the economy).