It's different in principle. I'm not saying that this will be easy to manage in practice, that's not the point I was trying to make. There seems to be some clear cut cases however, like bullying and character assassinations where perhaps law enforcement is involved. I think the question it self is important, and it will be interesting to see how this works out in practice.

Censorship is censorship, whether initiated by bureaucrats or citizens.

In this case it's removal of your own data, so it's self-censorship if anything.

What does it mean when Eric Schmidt says someone "should" have a right to do something, when his company works against it every day?