Re:Wait-free queueing and ultra-low latency logging
by acqq on Friday May 30, 2014 @08:19AM
(#7821320)
> disregard any loss of information since it is not critical.
Excuse me but I'd like to have it clearly stated: which information is actually lost in your implementation? Do some of the messages passed to be written actually end not being written? Which part ends up not knowing count/size?
Excuse me but I'd like to have it clearly stated: which information is actually lost in your implementation? Do some of the messages passed to be written actually end not being written? Which part ends up not knowing count/size?