News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker? by DrStalker on Thursday May 29, 2014 @12:07AM (#7814673)
Do agencies like the NSA/FBI/etc have the power to make a company publicly lie against their will?
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker? by joshAg on Thursday May 29, 2014 @01:25AM (#7814872)
if you count lies of omission, yes. you can be required as part of an ongoing investigation or court case to not talk about it. The legal term is "gag order".
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker? by danielweber on Thursday May 29, 2014 @09:02AM (#7815984)
If you are ordered not to communicate something, you are ordered not to communicate it. Doing a "I'm not not telling you something, ha ha" might work on the playground, but not in real life.
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker? by DrStalker on Sunday June 01, 2014 @09:18PM (#7831405)
I meant can the NSA force you to keep publishing "we have not worked with the NSA" when you have worked with them.