Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker?
by BoppreH on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @11:41PM
(#7814586)
Why have dozens of steps and seventeen screenshots detailing how to migrate a Windows partition and only a joke line for the Linux version? And why Bitlocker? Then there was the license change, new version with different features... This imbalance of effort strikes me as incredibly odd if the author was merely rushed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker?
by vertis on Thursday May 29, 2014 @12:01AM
(#7814653)
Linux users can be trusted to work things out for themselves?
Re:TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker?
by npsimons on Thursday May 29, 2014 @12:43AM
(#7814780)
I'll wager most Linux users don't even use TrueCrypt, since we've had FDE in the form of LUKS/DMcrypt since forever, and could not give a damn about being able to read those partitions from other OSes (as if! Since when do Windows and OSX support Linux filesystems? it's always been the other way around).