Re:Is Rust web yet? Not really
by yuriks on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @05:43PM
(#7813159)
Such cache line will (because it is adjancent to the refcounted data) almost always be in cache anyway. Rust's refcounting is much cheaper than C++'s refcounting because it doesn't need to be atomic. (There is a separate type for atomic RC, and it is enforced by the compiler that you use it when needed.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.