Re:Radxa: $100 Quad-Core ARM Raspberry Pi Alternative
by dublinben on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @02:08PM
(#7811843)
I can confirm that the BBB uses no more than 500mA while running intensive tasks. I have mine connected to a power supply that only provides that much, and it hasn't had any issues.
Re:Radxa: $100 Quad-Core ARM Raspberry Pi Alternative
by mongrol on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @06:55PM
(#7813510)
Beaglebone Black all the way. Low powered, more grunt than a Rpi and can run with no binary blobs whatsoever.
Re:Radxa: $100 Quad-Core ARM Raspberry Pi Alternative
by Pfiffer on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @01:50PM
(#7811751)
I'd be interested in this too. Have you looked at maybe using the WR703n[0]? It runs OpenWRT. I think that hovers around 500mA as well, though.
Re:Radxa: $100 Quad-Core ARM Raspberry Pi Alternative
by maguirre on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @02:53PM
(#7812079)
I was excited about the BBB specially because of the NAND Flash availability.
In similar fashion as the RPi back in the day lead time is (as far as I can tell) in months
Re:Radxa: $100 Quad-Core ARM Raspberry Pi Alternative
by adventureloop on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @03:32PM
(#7812286)
Whats your application? We have a pi up a mountain on a solar panel and it is doing ok.
Does anyone know Raspberry Pi alternative that uses little power and supports low power states?
AFAIK RPI has pretty flat power usage at ~500-1000mA. BeagleBone Black seems to be lower power (~200mA?) but it's hard to verify this claim.
(I need a box that will mostly stay idle but online, for things like ssh servers)