News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Euclid, Schmeuclid.

Re:Euclid, Schmeuclid by gyom on Sunday August 23, 2009 @02:44AM (#780303)
My conclusion was actually that the points M and N must be the same point, which then implies that they also coincide with R.

The drawing can be "faked" by sketching the diameters to be a bit off-center, which results in M,N and R not being exactly the same point.

No ?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Euclid, Schmeuclid by jeffbradberry on Sunday August 23, 2009 @10:31PM (#781389)
Exactly.
[ Parent | on HN ]