I agree. An open bracelet would be cool but from a bussiness point of view it doesn't make that much sense. There are countless of startups who refused to focus on a core target market and failed. Instead what you should do is focus your development efforts on the core product and listen to community feedback for cool ideas, then provide the necessary API for them to build it. Which is basically what these guys are doing.
Re:Smash: The game changing tennis wearable
by darkmighty on Monday May 26, 2014 @10:53PM
(#7802631)
I don't think accuracy of IMU's out there vary dramatically, and the noise shouldn't matter too much (all major ones within some +-3 db?) -- sure, if they were a few orders of magnitude more accurate you would get a whole new type of applications -- but with current ranges you're restricted to some kind of pattern recognition (i.e. not full motion tracking), which is quite noise resilient.
Re:Smash: The game changing tennis wearable
by sliverstorm on Monday May 26, 2014 @11:19PM
(#7802692)
By "noise" I wasn't just referring to noise in the sensor. PSU noise, for example, needs to be controlled to below some limit. That increases the BOM count and thus $$$.
But you probably could market one bracelet for a couple different sports, so long as they are similar & you can write the software. Baseball & tennis might overlap a lot, for example.