News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The "Work For Hire" Doctrine Almost Never Works in Software Contracts. Parent comment

Re:The "Work For Hire" Doctrine Almost Never Works in Softwa... by platz on Monday May 26, 2014 @07:44PM (#7802180)
And the article is arguing that the "work-for-hire" clause isn't sufficient to cause the contractor to loose the copyright.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The "Work For Hire" Doctrine Almost Never Works in Softwa... by Dystopian on Monday May 26, 2014 @07:57PM (#7802208)
And in turn the company should look to copyright assignment.

As a contractor, you shouldn't be signing umbrella work-for-hire clauses either. They're usually part of the shotgun approach of "we own everything you do, always, ever".

Copyright assignment is where the give-and-take should take place (which I'm surprised the author didn't speak about) - "company gets copyright assignment based on XYZ (which could include payment, equity agreement, etc.)"

IANAL - I just hire one with one who protects me from signing stupid stuff and is occasionally the nasty stick when clients act up.

[ Parent | on HN ]