Re:$1000 for making HTML5 supercomputing applications open s...
by wldlyinaccurate on Monday May 26, 2014 @01:29PM
(#7800655)
It's extra work for website owners to build/test/maintain opt-out functionality. Have you considered offering a pre-built opt in/out widget which can be re-styled and integrated easily?
Or you could even just provide website owners with a "global opt-out" URL that they can stick in their footer.
Re:$1000 for making HTML5 supercomputing applications open s...
by pgfonseca on Monday May 26, 2014 @01:33PM
(#7800676)
This link is a global opt-out :)
We don't want anyone on the platform who isn't aware/comfortable with it. Our instructions to the websites (when they join) are to create a link to the opt out page. I supposed it could be a direct opt out
Re:$1000 for making HTML5 supercomputing applications open s...
by plam on Monday May 26, 2014 @01:30PM
(#7800660)
It seems one of the biggest business issues is site visitor perception. I have a couple questions please.
What's your opt-rate rate so far out of the sites that have shown this option?
do you have any real data regarding hidden cost to a site visitor? like power consumption A/B testing or something?
Re:$1000 for making HTML5 supercomputing applications open s...
by pgfonseca on Monday May 26, 2014 @01:34PM
(#7800681)
The opt out rate has been close to 0, but (in all fairness) that has been due to the way websites choose to display it.
A standard for how to display might be called for, perhaps?
Re:$1000 for making HTML5 supercomputing applications open s...
by martinald on Tuesday May 27, 2014 @05:47AM
(#7803669)
What do you mean? Unused cycles makes no sense. I'd be really annoyed if my laptop's battery life drops from 5 hours browsing the web to 1hour because it is running at 100% all the time due to this.
https://ss.crowdprocess.com/opt-out.html
Having said that, I am the first to admit that many websites aren't currently displaying this, we need to work on that.