Re:Give PonyORM a chance
by reitanqild on Monday May 26, 2014 @09:26AM
(#7799633)
As much as AGPL annoys me the pony developers seems to understand it and use it in a reasonable way.
What really annoys me is
1. when people stamp a AGPL license on something (that was previously licensed under GPL or even less restrictive) and claim that it is still just GPL and everyone could still continue using their system as before.
2. when people make something brilliant and only offer it under AGPL without providing a commercial licensing option.
Re:Give PonyORM a chance
by thu on Monday May 26, 2014 @10:02AM
(#7799750)
3. when the code is AGPL, receives contributions, then the original author offers a commercial license including said contributions without any contributor agreement.
What really annoys me is
1. when people stamp a AGPL license on something (that was previously licensed under GPL or even less restrictive) and claim that it is still just GPL and everyone could still continue using their system as before.
2. when people make something brilliant and only offer it under AGPL without providing a commercial licensing option.