News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Good Poker Players Aren't Lucky by splonk on Thursday May 22, 2014 @03:15AM (#7782536)
Without double checking your math, I'm pretty sure the significant error in your conclusion here is modeling the games he's playing as coin flipping with even payouts. The specific game he's playing is actually dropping a percentage each time and is more accurately modeled as "heads I win .98, tails I lose 1". (Technically he's betting $15 for a chance to win $14.69). With that in mind, many fewer than 1 in 28 players would end up with his results.
Re:Good Poker Players Aren't Lucky by ronaldx on Thursday May 22, 2014 @06:21AM (#7783055)
Typically in poker, you win quickly and lose slowly. This is especially true of tournaments - finishing in the money suddenly does wonders for your balance.

So, I would guess that more than 1 in 28 players would show these results, having experienced a random "win quickly" phase that has yet to dissipate.

(This might not apply if parent is talking only about 2 player tournaments, but applies to poker generally)

Re:Good Poker Players Aren't Lucky by splonk on Thursday May 22, 2014 @08:49PM (#7787465)
Parent is talking only about 2 player tournaments - that's what the "heads up" part of the description means.
Re:Good Poker Players Aren't Lucky by ronaldx on Saturday May 24, 2014 @06:59PM (#7794693)
OK, I getcha, thanks.

Heads Up specifically means that there are match-ups between 2 players. This doesn't mean it's necessarily a 2 player tournament, e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Heads-Up_Poker_Champi...

I already checked this case and you are right, indeed.

Re:Good Poker Players Aren't Lucky by flud43 on Thursday May 22, 2014 @03:44AM (#7782611)
Yes, sorry, I should have specified that each buy-in has a small percentage raked from it which goes to PokerStars for hosting the game.

Rake is a part of every form of real money poker. It's how casinos and online poker sites make their $$$'s.