News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary by platz on Wednesday May 21, 2014 @01:42AM (#7776863)
I thought it was great, one of the best books I've ever read. Actually, in large part due to the language.

But I know a lot of people who tried it and were turned off; they seemed to get put by this "showboating".

Re:Using the wrong dictionary by egypturnash on Wednesday May 21, 2014 @02:03AM (#7776907)
Don't forget the fact that the book, even in paperback, is big enough to severely wound somebody if you throw it at their head. And something like a third of its bulk is footnotes. Lengthy footnotes that can be fill most of a page. There is a certain joy to making your way through a dense labyrinth of a story like this, but you have to put a lot of energy into the journey...
Re:Using the wrong dictionary by kbenson on Wednesday May 21, 2014 @12:46PM (#7779214)
Okay, now I'm definitely sold. I'm a sucker for footnotes in a story.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary by platz on Thursday May 22, 2014 @02:06PM (#7785249)
For footnotes, have to mention House of Leaves (Danielewski) as well, although this definitely falls more into the gimmicky "hold the book up to the mirror" camp than the eloquence of IJ.