Re:Sacked Google worker awarded €110,000 for unfair dismissal
by rhizome on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @09:06PM
(#7776182)
It could hardly avoid doing that, per at least a couple of Vanity Fair articles
The blog appeared 8 years before those articles.
Re:Sacked Google worker awarded €110,000 for unfair dismissal
by hga on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @10:19PM
(#7776385)
My point is that if the first Vanity Fair article is correct, that "Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of Microsoft...", then Mini-Microsoft could not help but to discuss it a lot. As he and his commentators did, in chilling detail.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2012/07/microsoft-dow...
"“Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of Microsoft, something that drove out untold numbers of employees,” [Kurt] Eichenwald writes."
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2012/08/microsoft-lost-mo...
I don't believe I've read the second one, but it expands on the corporate culture that required someone's official failure for you to survive:
"In those years [when it failed] Microsoft had stepped up its efforts to cripple competitors, but—because of a series of astonishingly foolish management decisions—the competitors being crippled were often co-workers at Microsoft, instead of other companies. Staffers were rewarded not just for doing well but for making sure that their colleagues failed. As a result, the company was consumed by an endless series of internal knife fights. Potential market-busting businesses—such as e-book and smartphone technology—were killed, derailed, or delayed amid bickering and power plays.