Re:Space Hackers Prepare to Reboot 35-Year-Old Spacecraft
by jacquesm on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @10:27AM
(#7772690)
The 400W transmitter is doable, the large parabolic antenna would be a bit harder to hide. Though, as you up the power you can use a smaller antenna. The giveaway then becomes fried birds falling out of the sky.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Space Hackers Prepare to Reboot 35-Year-Old Spacecraft
by Already__Taken on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @10:40AM
(#7772739)
You also wouldn't have the hardest time finding where a 400W+ signal is coming from.
Re:Space Hackers Prepare to Reboot 35-Year-Old Spacecraft
by jacquesm on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @10:45AM
(#7772775)
You're going 'up' with a highly directional antenna, and you're going to be transmitting very short bursts. The biggest risk will be the lobes projecting from the antenna some of those will be pointing back at the planet instead of into space. Airtraffic will have the biggest risk of interference (also because the frequency band is close).
So kidding aside you will need to make very certain that (1) you have the right permits and (2) that your gear is not inadvertently sending out a dirty signal. The narrower the better. Better start shopping for a second hand spectrum analyzer ;)
Re:Space Hackers Prepare to Reboot 35-Year-Old Spacecraft
by Serow225 on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @12:13PM
(#7773367)
It's not even building a big dish that's the problem, it's that it has to be pointed extremely accurately and stably, and preferably able to track..t
Re:Space Hackers Prepare to Reboot 35-Year-Old Spacecraft
by snops on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @07:57PM
(#7775926)
Half of the problem is recieving signals back, as you can't just turn up the power on the satellite. I suppose if you knew exactly what command to send, and there was no form of handshaking this might not be a problem.