Re:After a 30-Year Run, Rise of the Super-Rich Hits a Wall
by fallentimes on Friday August 21, 2009 @01:34AM
(#777059)
I don't think people are down voting you on the basis of perceived correctness. Hacker News and politics just don't mix well, thankfully.
Re:After a 30-Year Run, Rise of the Super-Rich Hits a Wall
by anigbrowl on Friday August 21, 2009 @02:50AM
(#777130)
I think you make a good point, though it seems to me that Congressional Democrats (and their voting base) are more enamored of handing the bill to the wealthy than the White House, which has a good few pragmatic people in it.
Sadly, factual statements on political matters often alienate both sides in the debate - without context, they may assume the worst about your motives.
Re:After a 30-Year Run, Rise of the Super-Rich Hits a Wall
by timr on Friday August 21, 2009 @05:01AM
(#777227)
They're voting you down, at least in part, because you're personalizing and over-simplifying the debate. Had you said:
"This is bad for the current health care proposals that are working their way though congress, because they tend to rely on taxes on upper-income citizens"
you would have communicated the same point, and sounded much less like a troll.
Re:After a 30-Year Run, Rise of the Super-Rich Hits a Wall
by ars on Friday August 21, 2009 @06:56AM
(#777303)
Is that true though?
I know that Obama said it.
But I have not heard that said about the proposals.
It could be, but I have not heard that, so I can't say it.
But, thanks for at least letting me know what was wrong with the tone of my post.
Edit: Downmods for a factually correct statement, without any comments? Wow, healthcare is a seriously political thing.
Edit2: And even more downmods. Here's a link showing what I wrote is correct: http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/2009/07/22/Obama-Middle-...