News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by icey on Thursday August 20, 2009 @04:02PM (#776019)
Yes it's the old "fixing the signal to noise ratio by adding lots of noise" gambit.
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by hughprime on Thursday August 20, 2009 @04:13PM (#776051)
Not a bad gambit actually -- I'll sometimes turn on my air conditioner to drown out the sound of my neighbour's music.

The analogy only works if, like me, you consider Erlang articles to be a sort of white noise that you hardly notice, and the-programmer-formerly-known-as-_why articles as being slightly annoying.

Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by hvs on Thursday August 20, 2009 @04:40PM (#776152)
It appears to be working, too.
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by icey on Thursday August 20, 2009 @04:45PM (#776171)
It's kind of dumb since all it takes to get the _why stuff off the front page is for people to upvote other submissions that are arguably more relevant (and current).
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by gloob on Thursday August 20, 2009 @05:05PM (#776256)
Front page is a positive feedback loop. People upvote the stories they see.
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by ErrantX on Thursday August 20, 2009 @05:01PM (#776239)
and flag the _why stuff
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by hvs on Thursday August 20, 2009 @07:39PM (#776651)
Which I started doing when it got out of control, but I'm apparently in the minority. I don't really care one way or the other, I just don't read what I'm not interested in.
Re:Hacker News full of Erlang articles by apotheon on Thursday August 20, 2009 @06:21PM (#776469)
. . . if, by "working", you mean "replacing one form of noise with another, much louder form that will probably outlast the likely lifespan of the original form".