News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests. Parent comment

Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by harkyns_castle on Friday May 16, 2014 @04:56AM (#7754498)
> It's sad, but as a foreigner I don't see that

In particular I find the constant harking back to "Well, we don't spy on US citizens, only everyone else." particularly annoying.

Like that's OK.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by MichaelGG on Friday May 16, 2014 @05:42AM (#7754629)
If a national spy agency had a rule against spying on non-citizens, it would not be much of a spying agency, would it? Additionally, outside of specific treaties, why should one country have certain obligations to other countries' citizens?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by claudius on Friday May 16, 2014 @07:21AM (#7754900)
Of course no country has such an obligation per se. But if your government constantly attacks my infrastructure, why oh why should I even consider paying a penny for your service? Given that many American companies still market to users outside the US, this nevertheless seems to be the overall expectation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by goodcanadian on Friday May 16, 2014 @05:47PM (#7758123)
It is not about spying or not spying, it is about spying on legitimate targets. All countries (should) have obligations to basic human rights. If I were a head of state, I would expect the U.S. to attempt to spy on me (and I would expect my country to stop them). As an private individual, I very much have the same rights under the U.S. constitution as do U.S. citizens. It is not OK to violate my right to to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. They should have to get a warrant to spy on me, just as they (should) have to do for an American.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by harkyns_castle on Friday May 16, 2014 @05:49AM (#7754642)
Quite right, it'd be a terrible spy agency with those restrictions. I have no issue with warranted investigations, or prosecuting people doing bad things.

I'm arguing that broad, warrantless surveillance is a horrible, chilling thing to be doing. The fact that everyone is doing it doesn't make me feel better.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by sliverstorm on Friday May 16, 2014 @03:11PM (#7757337)
Let me get this straight...

- we are a spy agency

- we cannot spy on citizens

- we cannot spy on non-citizens

Best spy agency ever.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by timknauf on Friday May 16, 2014 @05:06AM (#7754527)
I've been constantly surprised about how little scrutiny that kind of statement has received in the media - American or otherwise. I thought it would've publicly raised more hackles here in New Zealand (but I guess we all ultimately just feel powerless in the face of such determined surveillance might).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by harkyns_castle on Friday May 16, 2014 @05:38AM (#7754613)
Same thing in Australia, its surprised me also it's not picked up on more. But after the likes of George Brandis' comments (essentially that Snowden was a crook yada yada), I'm starting to not be surprised. The other thing which I find depressing are comments along the lines of "Oh, everyone is doing it, its fine". I don't see that, I think its a damn scummy thing to be doing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by happyscrappy on Friday May 16, 2014 @02:08PM (#7756854)
It is almost as if Australians don't realize they are part of the problem.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who Has Your Back 2014: Protecting Your Data From Governm... by aestra on Friday May 16, 2014 @01:20PM (#7756598)
>In particular I find the constant harking back to "Well, we don't spy on US citizens, only everyone else." particularly annoying.

It is annoying, but there is a reason why it is being said. Laws (are supposed to) prohibit (more or less) the US spying on its own citizens without cause. It is written into the constitution (more or less). Foreigners don't have that protection under law. Whether that should be changed or not is a different question than are these programs legal under current laws.

[ Parent | on HN ]