Re:Why cyclists should be able to roll through stop signs, r...
by gbog on Thursday May 15, 2014 @08:09PM
(#7753065)
Wow, no, sail boat will not cut the path of a super tanker, if I remember correctly (I have navigation permit).
And you can't apply your courteous rule for traffic in places with many elder pedestrians like China: other people and vehicles would never move.
I think, however, that removing rules and applying common sense could work if we could use a communication network inspired from biological patterns.
Re:Why cyclists should be able to roll through stop signs, r...
by simonlebo on Thursday May 15, 2014 @08:20PM
(#7753101)
Yes there are some logical exceptions to the motor boat always give way. These are however exceptions.
http://www.gosailing.info/Navigation%20Rules.htm
The equivalent in the cycling example would be that trains have to give way to cyclists which was not my point.
I do agree with a lot of this article about the uselessness of enforcing outdated road rules to cyclists. I personally will rarely completely stop at stop sign. I find the danger much higher to try to immobilize the bike, un-clip the shoe and start again with a very slow speed (potentially exposing myself for a much longer period of time in that dangerous crossing zone).
To solve accidents between all of these actors, I think there should be a simple rule of giving the slowest vehicle always the right of way, which is what courteous people do. A pedestrians should always have priority over a cyclist and or a motorist. If accident happen, the cyclist/motorist should take the full responsibility for it. Likewise a cyclist should have priority over a motorist. The person at fault should be proven guilty unless proven innocent of some unpredictable situation.
It is a bit the same on the water, where motor boats have to give way to wind powered boat for the same logical reasons.