News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Consider a Different Physics Textbook by leephillips on Thursday May 15, 2014 @09:30AM (#7749264)
There is a long history of trying out different ways to teach physics to undergraduates. In my undergraduate college the faculty experimented with starting with quantum mechanics and ending up with classical physics; introductory calculus was sometimes taught using nonstandard analysis. My thesis advisor in graduate school wrote an intro physics text that included simulations from the beginning, in the `80s. He even wrote a special version of Basic that used vectors to make it easier for students. In Germany it's popular to teach mechanics using momentum currents instead of the force concept.

I agree that introducing numerics early is risky: it's easy to get what looks like a smooth, convergent solution from a naive calculation that happens to be wrong.

Re:Consider a Different Physics Textbook by judk on Thursday May 15, 2014 @10:15AM (#7749516)
Richard Feynman taught simulation (of planetary orbits) in his famous first-year lectures (which became the famous text book) with a page long table of computed values, and remarked that this was a powerful new technique that was going to dominate physics as computers increased in power.
Re:Consider a Different Physics Textbook by leephillips on Thursday May 15, 2014 @10:22AM (#7749555)
This might have been what inspired my advisor, who's thesis advisor was Feynman (making Feynman my grand-advisor).