News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by erichocean on Tuesday May 13, 2014 @07:35PM (#7741270)
If by dynamic, you mean: the compiled code for the same exact shader source code can be wildly different at runtime, based on the inputs, OSL is dynamic in that sense.

If you mean something else…then I guess not. It's a shader after all, not a general purpose programming language.

I tend to use dynamic in the sense of static vs. dynamic, where dynamic is "happens at runtime" and static is "happens before runtime".

Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by bronxbomber92 on Tuesday May 13, 2014 @08:47PM (#7741565)
I think nadav256 meant dynamically typed. I.E. most languages that target LLVM are statically typed, and this project is one of the few (the first?) to successfully leverage LLVM for a dynamically typed language.
Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by sanxiyn on Tuesday May 13, 2014 @10:38PM (#7741912)
Julia is another dynamically typed language using LLVM. On the other hand, Julia was designed to use LLVM. I think this may be the first to succeed in dynamically typed language not designed to use LLVM.
Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by ihnorton on Tuesday May 13, 2014 @10:58PM (#7741960)
What about Rubinius? (don't know much about it; does it not qualify as successful?)
Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by erichocean on Wednesday May 14, 2014 @12:40AM (#7742232)
There's also Python's "Unladen Swallow" attempt.[0]

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unladen_Swallow

Re:Introducing the WebKit FTL JIT by bobbyi_settv on Wednesday May 14, 2014 @01:03AM (#7742277)
Unladen Swallow is a dead project at this point (although many lessons were learned from it). The active Python LLVM Jit project is Dropbox's Pyston:

https://github.com/dropbox/pyston

https://tech.dropbox.com/2014/04/introducing-pyston-an-upcom...