Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment
by unreal37 on Sunday May 11, 2014 @12:24AM
(#7727764)
All the hyperbole is not really adding to the conversation.
Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment
by pekk on Sunday May 11, 2014 @02:39AM
(#7727983)
The underlying point that this really isn't about gourmet extraction of flavor is relevant, however. If Starbucks can serve lower-temperature coffee, McDonald's can, its coffee is not even as good as Starbucks'.
McDonalds coffee, conversely, is just plain old shit. It's the worst coffee I've ever had, and that is saying quite a lot. If you've ever tasted it, you know that they could brew it at 200, 180, or 140, and it's still going to taste just as godawful. There is absolutely no reason they need to be passing it out the drive-through window at temperatures high enough to peel skin and poach flesh if the half-awake minimum-wage worker who poured it didn't pop the lid on quite right -- or if, while taking the cup and getting it settled into the console, you fail to pay the sort of attention commensurate to a potentially life-threatening process which you probably didn't realize was potentially life-threatening.