News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment by mindslight on Saturday May 10, 2014 @11:16PM (#7727615)
As much as I'd like to see less general waste, it's important to keep in mind that any large disposable hot coffee cup is a flimsy piece junk with the lid removed, millions are sold per day, those lids even sometimes pop off, and yet we're talking about a 22 year old case for its remarkability.
Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment by aaronem on Saturday May 10, 2014 @11:48PM (#7727694)
Is it remarkable because of how rare it is for admittedly insufficient disposable coffee cups to negligently discharge their contents all over their users, or because of how rare it is that such discharge results in life-threatening injuries and years of reconstructive treatment to try to repair destroyed genitals?
Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment by mindslight on Sunday May 11, 2014 @01:53AM (#7727920)
Yes, people take care with dangerous/messy things. Is any possible source of danger to be considered a problem to be eliminated? If that's what you're after, please go join an appropriate lifestyle community, as your desire is an abstracted fantasy incongruent with reality.
Re:How A Lawsuit Over Hot Coffee Helped Erode the 7th Amendment by makomk on Sunday May 11, 2014 @03:08AM (#7728033)
The case isn't remarkable because she got third-degree burns all over her legs and genitals, it's remarkable because McDonalds didn't settle out of court like in the hundreds of other similar lawsuits against them around the same time period. (And this was after they'd received a number of warnings that their coffee was unsafe too.)