Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf]
by rayiner on Friday May 09, 2014 @02:16PM
(#7722434)
I was thinking of exactly this, and I'd love to hear an explanation of why it wouldn't work. I think Oracle's win here is pretty "thin" in that regard. You could attack the translation tool, but it's just a directory mapping Java names to AlterJava names. What those Java names happen to be called are, under Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co., uncopyrightable facts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf]
by jpollock on Friday May 09, 2014 @05:56PM
(#7723464)
The hardest part in any clean room implementation is finding people with no prior knowledge of the source to make the clone.
Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf]
by danielweber on Sunday May 11, 2014 @03:15PM
(#7729577)
Is it that hard to find people who haven't looked at the Java source code?