News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf] by rayiner on Friday May 09, 2014 @02:16PM (#7722434)
I was thinking of exactly this, and I'd love to hear an explanation of why it wouldn't work. I think Oracle's win here is pretty "thin" in that regard. You could attack the translation tool, but it's just a directory mapping Java names to AlterJava names. What those Java names happen to be called are, under Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co., uncopyrightable facts.
Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf] by jpollock on Friday May 09, 2014 @05:56PM (#7723464)
The hardest part in any clean room implementation is finding people with no prior knowledge of the source to make the clone.
Re:Oracle wins appeal re Java API copyrightability [pdf] by danielweber on Sunday May 11, 2014 @03:15PM (#7729577)
Is it that hard to find people who haven't looked at the Java source code?