Re:Apple Said to Be in Talks to Buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
by rhizome on Friday May 09, 2014 @03:59AM
(#7719857)
Beats is EXTREMELY WELL positioned to be a major iTunes competitor without the overhead of computer hardware and software divisions. Not only that, but while Apple is cool, Dre is much, much cooler.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple Said to Be in Talks to Buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
by OWaz on Friday May 09, 2014 @01:24PM
(#7722066)
Beats streaming apparently has about 200,000 subscribers. That doesn't seem so cool when it's competitor Spotify has about 10 million subscribers.[1] Even if you think Apple is going for the subscriber base it still doesn't make sense.
[1]:http://recode.net/2014/05/08/why-apple-is-betting-big-on-bea...
Re:Apple Said to Be in Talks to Buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
by rhizome on Friday May 09, 2014 @02:12PM
(#7722414)
I don't think it's about Apple purchasing a turnkey subscription service. Beats is an extremely strong brand with a lot of momentum who has been built from a consumer-electronics foundation, where Apple still has laptops and whatnot markets to wrangle. Beats likely does not have the infrastructure to be a turnkey rebranded acquisition anyway. However, download sales are down and going lower, so Apple does need to think about a future where streaming is dominant.