News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by crusso on Thursday May 08, 2014 @07:56PM (#7718490)
“back-to-front”—the chosen boarding process of most U.S. carriers

Nobody boards back to front. First class boards first. Then frequent flyers, who typically get the seats toward the front of the aircraft. Then there's some semi-random zone thing whereby big hold-ups occur waiting for people in the front and middle of the plane to put their bags in the overheads.

If airplanes got rid of the overhead bins and really did load the planes back to front, boarding would go a lot faster.

Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by krisgee on Thursday May 08, 2014 @08:33PM (#7718628)
>If airplanes got rid of the overhead bins

This. And actually enforce the baggage limits they say they do. I usually only take a small carry on that fits under the next seat but I've seen people with enough provisions to supply the entire eastern front as carry on and it's ridiculous that they're even allowed.

Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by deathanatos on Thursday May 08, 2014 @08:50PM (#7718680)
> “back-to-front”—the chosen boarding process of most U.S. carriers

> Nobody boards back to front.

Just to add weight to this, I've flown on at least United, American, Delta, and Southwest, and in my experience, none of them board back-to-front. These are the very airlines mentioned in the article!

> (From the article) United uses an “outside-in” boarding process by which people with window seats board ahead of those on the aisle.

I doubt this as well.

The only thing I've found that does speed up boarding is that some (rare) airports support jetways with two doors: one for the front of the plane, and one for the back. (Albany is the only airport I know of.) Getting on/off the back is significantly quicker in my experience. (Practically no waiting, between the gate and the seat. There's still the line at the gate, of course.)

Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by brc on Thursday May 08, 2014 @08:53PM (#7718692)
Virgin Australia domestic planes sometimes board without jetways (even in airports with jetways). I believe this is to save on landing fees. When they do this, they open front and back doors with stairs. These planes board significantly faster than using a jetway and single door, even accounting for people having to go down stairs and across the tarmac.
Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by HelloMcFly on Thursday May 08, 2014 @07:59PM (#7718501)
Alaska board back-front after first-class and other "preferred customers" have boarded. Amounts to about the same thing.
Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by curun1r on Friday May 09, 2014 @05:03PM (#7723254)
Last time I flew Alaska (shortly after the Superbowl), they had a boarding group for people wearing Russell Wilson jerseys that boarded just after their military service personnel group.

By the time they got to us regular folks, there was barely anyone left to get on the plane.

Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by balls187 on Thursday May 08, 2014 @08:11PM (#7718555)
Actually, families with young children & people who need extra time board first.

Then first class boards.

Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by xarball on Thursday May 08, 2014 @08:35PM (#7718638)
People who need "a little more time" to board.
Re:The Dumb Way We Board Airplanes Remains Impervious to Goo... by timmyelliot on Thursday May 08, 2014 @09:41PM (#7718854)
That link in (in the article itself) indicates that most do (but I've never been on a rear-to-front flight myself either):

with rear to front being, Air Canada Alaska American British Airways Continental Frontier JetBlue Spirit Virgin Atlantic