Re:Replicant developers find and close Samsung Galaxy backdoor
by eli on Thursday May 08, 2014 @12:41PM
(#7716198)
Any security bug or potential security bug could be a backdoor. I don't think it's fair to say you "closed a backdoor" every time you fix one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Replicant developers find and close Samsung Galaxy backdoor
by mindslight on Thursday May 08, 2014 @01:05PM
(#7716332)
"Bug" implies a mistake/oversight where the additional functionality was known to noone, and then discovered. This functionality was deliberately created, thus it's a "backdoor".
Based on what seemingly passes for "accepted practice" in the mobile world (download QPST for tons of fun!), the only sane way to have a trustable mobile device is with a separate cell-modem and a well-defined interface.
Re:Replicant developers find and close Samsung Galaxy backdoor
by eli on Thursday May 08, 2014 @01:53PM
(#7716609)
I mean, maybe I'm confused, but this sounds like they closed one method (among others) that could potentially be used to create a backdoor by, I guess, a carrier or OEM.
There's no evidence that anyone's phone was open to remote exploit at any time.
Re:Replicant developers find and close Samsung Galaxy backdoor
by mindslight on Saturday May 10, 2014 @01:31PM
(#7726172)
It seems as if you're using a weird definition - "backdoor" just implies that the functionality exists, not that it has necessarily been utilized.