News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Microsoft really patched XP by the_hangman on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @01:10PM (#7705731)
> Arguably, the start menu not being full-screen is a bug.

A bug introduced in Windows 95 that they waited until 2013 to patch? I think after a certain number of years it might have moved from a bug to a feature.

For me, the problem with the new start screen is exactly what you describe. I'm fairly scatterbrained. When I'm going to open a program, file, etc., it's usually because of something else I have open, like an email with a request from a co-worker. When the start screen takes up the whole screen, I get distracted from the reason I opened it in the first place and have to go back to my email before I remember. I know that it's my problem, not Microsoft's, but at least having the choice between overlay or full screen would be nice.

Re:Why Microsoft really patched XP by jackvalentine on Wednesday May 07, 2014 @04:55AM (#7709233)
I consider the context-switching of the huge fullscreen start menu the same as the "forget why you entered a room when you walk through a door" phenomenom.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-walking-throug...